diff --git a/docs/pr-review-comments.md b/docs/pr-review-comments.md
index 12f7386ff3..f133056e6d 100644
--- a/docs/pr-review-comments.md
+++ b/docs/pr-review-comments.md
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ The body should include the strongest actionable, non-overlapping sections the
 report has:
 
 - `**Summary**` from the typed `changeSummary` field, not from the
-  merge verdict or maintainer follow-up summary
+  merge verdict or maintainer follow-up summary; when `reproductionAssessment`
+  is present, this section also includes a compact `Reproducibility:` line
 - `**Next step before merge**` for PRs, or `**Next step**` for issues, from the
   work-candidate reason or next action
 - `**Security**` from the typed `securityReview` field, so supply-chain,
diff --git a/src/clawsweeper.ts b/src/clawsweeper.ts
index 4fd207c383..7dc9856fe4 100644
--- a/src/clawsweeper.ts
+++ b/src/clawsweeper.ts
@@ -4155,6 +4155,22 @@ function appendPublicSection(lines: string[], heading: string, body: string): vo
   lines.push(`**${heading}**`, body, "");
 }
 
+function publicReproducibilityLine(reproductionAssessment: string): string {
+  const assessmentLine = sentence(reproductionAssessment);
+  if (!assessmentLine) return "";
+  const match = assessmentLine.match(/^(yes|no|unclear|not applicable)\b/i);
+  if (!match) return `Reproducibility: ${assessmentLine}`;
+  const status = match[1]?.toLowerCase() ?? "";
+  const detail = sentence(assessmentLine.slice(match[0].length).replace(/^[\s,.:;-]+/, ""));
+  return `Reproducibility: ${status}.${detail ? ` ${detail}` : ""}`;
+}
+
+function publicSummaryBody(summaryLine: string, reproductionAssessment: string): string {
+  return [summaryLine, publicReproducibilityLine(reproductionAssessment)]
+    .filter(Boolean)
+    .join("\n\n");
+}
+
 function appendReviewQuestionDetails(
   details: string[],
   reproductionAssessment: string | undefined,
@@ -4214,9 +4230,13 @@ function renderKeepOpenCommentFromReport(markdown: string): string {
     "",
   ];
   if (isPullRequest) {
-    appendPublicSection(lines, "Summary", changeSummaryLine);
+    appendPublicSection(
+      lines,
+      "Summary",
+      publicSummaryBody(changeSummaryLine, reproductionAssessment),
+    );
   } else {
-    appendPublicSection(lines, "Summary", summaryLine);
+    appendPublicSection(lines, "Summary", publicSummaryBody(summaryLine, reproductionAssessment));
   }
   appendPublicSection(lines, isPullRequest ? "Next step before merge" : "Next step", nextStepLine);
   appendPublicSection(lines, "Security", publicSecurityReviewLine(securityReview));
diff --git a/test/clawsweeper.test.ts b/test/clawsweeper.test.ts
index cf6451d24d..5d9593d9d2 100644
--- a/test/clawsweeper.test.ts
+++ b/test/clawsweeper.test.ts
@@ -1202,6 +1202,50 @@ Reason: Maintainers should review the tests after the targeted lane is green.
   assert.match(comment, /<!-- clawsweeper-verdict:needs-human item=74265 sha=abc123def456/);
 });
 
+test("issue keep-open review comments surface reproducibility in the summary", () => {
+  const comment = renderReviewCommentFromReport(
+    `${reportFrontMatter({
+      type: "issue",
+      number: "75877",
+      decision: "keep_open",
+      close_reason: "none",
+      work_candidate: "queue_fix_pr",
+    })}
+
+## Summary
+
+Keep open. Slack typing callbacks are disabled in message-tool-only group replies.
+
+## Reproduction Assessment
+
+Yes. A source-level reproduction is clear: set a Slack group turn to message-tool-only and inspect the dispatch typing callbacks.
+
+## Work Candidate
+
+Candidate: queue_fix_pr
+
+Confidence: high
+
+Priority: medium
+
+Status: queued
+
+Reason: The bug is narrow and source-reproducible.
+`,
+    "none",
+  );
+
+  assert.match(
+    comment,
+    /\*\*Summary\*\*\nKeep open\. Slack typing callbacks are disabled in message-tool-only group replies\.\n\nReproducibility: yes\. A source-level reproduction is clear/,
+  );
+  assert.ok(comment.indexOf("Reproducibility: yes.") < comment.indexOf("**Next step**"));
+  assert.match(
+    comment,
+    /Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue\?\n\nYes\. A source-level reproduction is clear/,
+  );
+});
+
 test("pull request review comments include dedicated security review", () => {
   const comment = renderReviewCommentFromReport(
     `${reportFrontMatter({