multi: introduce an option for resolutions
We don't always need the resolutions in the local force close summary so we make it an option.
This commit is contained in:
parent
78c8990772
commit
79d0655a96
@ -335,11 +335,10 @@ func (a *arbChannel) NewAnchorResolutions() (*lnwallet.AnchorResolutions,
|
||||
// ForceCloseChan should force close the contract that this attendant is
|
||||
// watching over. We'll use this when we decide that we need to go to chain. It
|
||||
// should in addition tell the switch to remove the corresponding link, such
|
||||
// that we won't accept any new updates. The returned summary contains all items
|
||||
// needed to eventually resolve all outputs on chain.
|
||||
// that we won't accept any new updates.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// NOTE: Part of the ArbChannel interface.
|
||||
func (a *arbChannel) ForceCloseChan() (*lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary, error) {
|
||||
func (a *arbChannel) ForceCloseChan() (*wire.MsgTx, error) {
|
||||
// First, we mark the channel as borked, this ensure
|
||||
// that no new state transitions can happen, and also
|
||||
// that the link won't be loaded into the switch.
|
||||
@ -386,7 +385,15 @@ func (a *arbChannel) ForceCloseChan() (*lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary, error)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
return chanMachine.ForceClose()
|
||||
|
||||
closeSummary, err := chanMachine.ForceClose(
|
||||
lnwallet.WithSkipContractResolutions(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return closeSummary.CloseTx, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// newActiveChannelArbitrator creates a new instance of an active channel
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1175,16 +1175,29 @@ func (c *chainWatcher) dispatchLocalForceClose(
|
||||
LocalChanConfig: c.cfg.chanState.LocalChanCfg,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
resolutions, err := forceClose.ContractResolutions.UnwrapOrErr(
|
||||
fmt.Errorf("resolutions not found"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If our commitment output isn't dust or we have active HTLC's on the
|
||||
// commitment transaction, then we'll populate the balances on the
|
||||
// close channel summary.
|
||||
if forceClose.CommitResolution != nil {
|
||||
closeSummary.SettledBalance = chanSnapshot.LocalBalance.ToSatoshis()
|
||||
closeSummary.TimeLockedBalance = chanSnapshot.LocalBalance.ToSatoshis()
|
||||
if resolutions.CommitResolution != nil {
|
||||
localBalance := chanSnapshot.LocalBalance.ToSatoshis()
|
||||
closeSummary.SettledBalance = localBalance
|
||||
closeSummary.TimeLockedBalance = localBalance
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, htlc := range forceClose.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs {
|
||||
htlcValue := btcutil.Amount(htlc.SweepSignDesc.Output.Value)
|
||||
closeSummary.TimeLockedBalance += htlcValue
|
||||
|
||||
if resolutions.HtlcResolutions != nil {
|
||||
for _, htlc := range resolutions.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs {
|
||||
htlcValue := btcutil.Amount(
|
||||
htlc.SweepSignDesc.Output.Value,
|
||||
)
|
||||
closeSummary.TimeLockedBalance += htlcValue
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Attempt to add a channel sync message to the close summary.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -504,14 +504,24 @@ func TestChainWatcherLocalForceCloseDetect(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// outputs.
|
||||
select {
|
||||
case summary := <-chanEvents.LocalUnilateralClosure:
|
||||
resOpt := summary.LocalForceCloseSummary.
|
||||
ContractResolutions
|
||||
|
||||
resolutions, err := resOpt.UnwrapOrErr(
|
||||
fmt.Errorf("resolutions not found"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to get resolutions: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure we correctly extracted the commit
|
||||
// resolution if we had a local output.
|
||||
if remoteOutputOnly {
|
||||
if summary.CommitResolution != nil {
|
||||
if resolutions.CommitResolution != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected no commit resolution")
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if summary.CommitResolution == nil {
|
||||
if resolutions.CommitResolution == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected commit resolution")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ type ArbChannel interface {
|
||||
// corresponding link, such that we won't accept any new updates. The
|
||||
// returned summary contains all items needed to eventually resolve all
|
||||
// outputs on chain.
|
||||
ForceCloseChan() (*lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary, error)
|
||||
ForceCloseChan() (*wire.MsgTx, error)
|
||||
|
||||
// NewAnchorResolutions returns the anchor resolutions for currently
|
||||
// valid commitment transactions.
|
||||
@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ func (c *ChannelArbitrator) stateStep(
|
||||
// We'll tell the switch that it should remove the link for
|
||||
// this channel, in addition to fetching the force close
|
||||
// summary needed to close this channel on chain.
|
||||
closeSummary, err := c.cfg.Channel.ForceCloseChan()
|
||||
forceCloseTx, err := c.cfg.Channel.ForceCloseChan()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Errorf("ChannelArbitrator(%v): unable to "+
|
||||
"force close: %v", c.cfg.ChanPoint, err)
|
||||
@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ func (c *ChannelArbitrator) stateStep(
|
||||
|
||||
return StateError, closeTx, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
closeTx = closeSummary.CloseTx
|
||||
closeTx = forceCloseTx
|
||||
|
||||
// Before publishing the transaction, we store it to the
|
||||
// database, such that we can re-publish later in case it
|
||||
@ -2871,11 +2871,36 @@ func (c *ChannelArbitrator) channelAttendant(bestHeight int32) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
closeTx := closeInfo.CloseTx
|
||||
|
||||
resolutions, err := closeInfo.ContractResolutions.
|
||||
UnwrapOrErr(
|
||||
fmt.Errorf("resolutions not found"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Errorf("ChannelArbitrator(%v): unable to "+
|
||||
"get resolutions: %v", c.cfg.ChanPoint,
|
||||
err)
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We make sure that the htlc resolutions are present
|
||||
// otherwise we would panic dereferencing the pointer.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// TODO(ziggie): Refactor ContractResolutions to use
|
||||
// options.
|
||||
if resolutions.HtlcResolutions == nil {
|
||||
log.Errorf("ChannelArbitrator(%v): htlc "+
|
||||
"resolutions not found",
|
||||
c.cfg.ChanPoint)
|
||||
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
contractRes := &ContractResolutions{
|
||||
CommitHash: closeTx.TxHash(),
|
||||
CommitResolution: closeInfo.CommitResolution,
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: *closeInfo.HtlcResolutions,
|
||||
AnchorResolution: closeInfo.AnchorResolution,
|
||||
CommitResolution: resolutions.CommitResolution,
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: *resolutions.HtlcResolutions,
|
||||
AnchorResolution: resolutions.AnchorResolution,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// When processing a unilateral close event, we'll
|
||||
@ -2884,7 +2909,7 @@ func (c *ChannelArbitrator) channelAttendant(bestHeight int32) {
|
||||
// available to fetch in that state, we'll also write
|
||||
// the commit set so we can reconstruct our chain
|
||||
// actions on restart.
|
||||
err := c.log.LogContractResolutions(contractRes)
|
||||
err = c.log.LogContractResolutions(contractRes)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Errorf("Unable to write resolutions: %v",
|
||||
err)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -693,11 +693,15 @@ func TestChannelArbitratorLocalForceClose(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
chanArbCtx.AssertState(StateCommitmentBroadcasted)
|
||||
|
||||
// Now notify about the local force close getting confirmed.
|
||||
//
|
||||
//nolint:lll
|
||||
chanArb.cfg.ChainEvents.LocalUnilateralClosure <- &LocalUnilateralCloseInfo{
|
||||
SpendDetail: &chainntnfs.SpendDetail{},
|
||||
LocalForceCloseSummary: &lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
CloseTx: &wire.MsgTx{},
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
CloseTx: &wire.MsgTx{},
|
||||
ContractResolutions: fn.Some(lnwallet.ContractResolutions{
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
},
|
||||
ChannelCloseSummary: &channeldb.ChannelCloseSummary{},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -969,15 +973,18 @@ func TestChannelArbitratorLocalForceClosePendingHtlc(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//nolint:lll
|
||||
chanArb.cfg.ChainEvents.LocalUnilateralClosure <- &LocalUnilateralCloseInfo{
|
||||
SpendDetail: &chainntnfs.SpendDetail{},
|
||||
LocalForceCloseSummary: &lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
CloseTx: closeTx,
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{
|
||||
OutgoingHTLCs: []lnwallet.OutgoingHtlcResolution{
|
||||
outgoingRes,
|
||||
ContractResolutions: fn.Some(lnwallet.ContractResolutions{
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{
|
||||
OutgoingHTLCs: []lnwallet.OutgoingHtlcResolution{
|
||||
outgoingRes,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
},
|
||||
ChannelCloseSummary: &channeldb.ChannelCloseSummary{},
|
||||
CommitSet: CommitSet{
|
||||
@ -1611,12 +1618,15 @@ func TestChannelArbitratorCommitFailure(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
closeType: channeldb.LocalForceClose,
|
||||
//nolint:lll
|
||||
sendEvent: func(chanArb *ChannelArbitrator) {
|
||||
chanArb.cfg.ChainEvents.LocalUnilateralClosure <- &LocalUnilateralCloseInfo{
|
||||
SpendDetail: &chainntnfs.SpendDetail{},
|
||||
LocalForceCloseSummary: &lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
CloseTx: &wire.MsgTx{},
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
CloseTx: &wire.MsgTx{},
|
||||
ContractResolutions: fn.Some(lnwallet.ContractResolutions{
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
},
|
||||
ChannelCloseSummary: &channeldb.ChannelCloseSummary{},
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1944,11 +1954,15 @@ func TestChannelArbitratorDanglingCommitForceClose(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// being canalled back. Also note that there're no HTLC
|
||||
// resolutions sent since we have none on our
|
||||
// commitment transaction.
|
||||
//
|
||||
//nolint:lll
|
||||
uniCloseInfo := &LocalUnilateralCloseInfo{
|
||||
SpendDetail: &chainntnfs.SpendDetail{},
|
||||
LocalForceCloseSummary: &lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
CloseTx: closeTx,
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
CloseTx: closeTx,
|
||||
ContractResolutions: fn.Some(lnwallet.ContractResolutions{
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
},
|
||||
ChannelCloseSummary: &channeldb.ChannelCloseSummary{},
|
||||
CommitSet: CommitSet{
|
||||
@ -2754,12 +2768,15 @@ func TestChannelArbitratorAnchors(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//nolint:lll
|
||||
chanArb.cfg.ChainEvents.LocalUnilateralClosure <- &LocalUnilateralCloseInfo{
|
||||
SpendDetail: &chainntnfs.SpendDetail{},
|
||||
LocalForceCloseSummary: &lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
CloseTx: closeTx,
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
AnchorResolution: anchorResolution,
|
||||
CloseTx: closeTx,
|
||||
ContractResolutions: fn.Some(lnwallet.ContractResolutions{
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
AnchorResolution: anchorResolution,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
},
|
||||
ChannelCloseSummary: &channeldb.ChannelCloseSummary{},
|
||||
CommitSet: CommitSet{
|
||||
@ -2993,14 +3010,10 @@ func (m *mockChannel) NewAnchorResolutions() (*lnwallet.AnchorResolutions,
|
||||
return &lnwallet.AnchorResolutions{}, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (m *mockChannel) ForceCloseChan() (*lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary, error) {
|
||||
func (m *mockChannel) ForceCloseChan() (*wire.MsgTx, error) {
|
||||
if m.forceCloseErr != nil {
|
||||
return nil, m.forceCloseErr
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
summary := &lnwallet.LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
CloseTx: &wire.MsgTx{},
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: &lnwallet.HtlcResolutions{},
|
||||
}
|
||||
return summary, nil
|
||||
return &wire.MsgTx{}, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -7793,6 +7793,18 @@ type LocalForceCloseSummary struct {
|
||||
// commitment state.
|
||||
CloseTx *wire.MsgTx
|
||||
|
||||
// ChanSnapshot is a snapshot of the final state of the channel at the
|
||||
// time the summary was created.
|
||||
ChanSnapshot channeldb.ChannelSnapshot
|
||||
|
||||
// ContractResolutions contains all the data required for resolving the
|
||||
// different output types of a commitment transaction.
|
||||
ContractResolutions fn.Option[ContractResolutions]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ContractResolutions contains all the data required for resolving the
|
||||
// different output types of a commitment transaction.
|
||||
type ContractResolutions struct {
|
||||
// CommitResolution contains all the data required to sweep the output
|
||||
// to ourselves. Since this is our commitment transaction, we'll need
|
||||
// to wait a time delay before we can sweep the output.
|
||||
@ -7801,19 +7813,38 @@ type LocalForceCloseSummary struct {
|
||||
// then this will be nil.
|
||||
CommitResolution *CommitOutputResolution
|
||||
|
||||
// HtlcResolutions contains all the data required to sweep any outgoing
|
||||
// HTLC's and incoming HTLc's we know the preimage to. For each of these
|
||||
// HTLC's, we'll need to go to the second level to sweep them fully.
|
||||
HtlcResolutions *HtlcResolutions
|
||||
|
||||
// ChanSnapshot is a snapshot of the final state of the channel at the
|
||||
// time the summary was created.
|
||||
ChanSnapshot channeldb.ChannelSnapshot
|
||||
|
||||
// AnchorResolution contains the data required to sweep the anchor
|
||||
// output. If the channel type doesn't include anchors, the value of
|
||||
// this field will be nil.
|
||||
AnchorResolution *AnchorResolution
|
||||
|
||||
// HtlcResolutions contains all the data required to sweep any outgoing
|
||||
// HTLC's and incoming HTLc's we know the preimage to. For each of these
|
||||
// HTLC's, we'll need to go to the second level to sweep them fully.
|
||||
HtlcResolutions *HtlcResolutions
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ForceCloseOpt is a functional option argument for the ForceClose method.
|
||||
type ForceCloseOpt func(*forceCloseConfig)
|
||||
|
||||
// forceCloseConfig holds the configuration options for force closing a channel.
|
||||
type forceCloseConfig struct {
|
||||
// skipResolution if true will skip creating the contract resolutions
|
||||
// when generating the force close summary.
|
||||
skipResolution bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// defaultForceCloseConfig returns the default force close configuration.
|
||||
func defaultForceCloseConfig() *forceCloseConfig {
|
||||
return &forceCloseConfig{}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// WithSkipContractResolutions creates an option to skip the contract
|
||||
// resolutions from the returned summary.
|
||||
func WithSkipContractResolutions() ForceCloseOpt {
|
||||
return func(cfg *forceCloseConfig) {
|
||||
cfg.skipResolution = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ForceClose executes a unilateral closure of the transaction at the current
|
||||
@ -7824,10 +7855,17 @@ type LocalForceCloseSummary struct {
|
||||
// outputs within the commitment transaction.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// TODO(roasbeef): all methods need to abort if in dispute state
|
||||
func (lc *LightningChannel) ForceClose() (*LocalForceCloseSummary, error) {
|
||||
func (lc *LightningChannel) ForceClose(opts ...ForceCloseOpt) (
|
||||
*LocalForceCloseSummary, error) {
|
||||
|
||||
lc.Lock()
|
||||
defer lc.Unlock()
|
||||
|
||||
cfg := defaultForceCloseConfig()
|
||||
for _, opt := range opts {
|
||||
opt(cfg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If we've detected local data loss for this channel, then we won't
|
||||
// allow a force close, as it may be the case that we have a dated
|
||||
// version of the commitment, or this is actually a channel shell.
|
||||
@ -7842,6 +7880,14 @@ func (lc *LightningChannel) ForceClose() (*LocalForceCloseSummary, error) {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if cfg.skipResolution {
|
||||
return &LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
ChanPoint: lc.channelState.FundingOutpoint,
|
||||
ChanSnapshot: *lc.channelState.Snapshot(),
|
||||
CloseTx: commitTx,
|
||||
}, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
localCommitment := lc.channelState.LocalCommitment
|
||||
summary, err := NewLocalForceCloseSummary(
|
||||
lc.channelState, lc.Signer, commitTx,
|
||||
@ -8048,12 +8094,14 @@ func NewLocalForceCloseSummary(chanState *channeldb.OpenChannel,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return &LocalForceCloseSummary{
|
||||
ChanPoint: chanState.FundingOutpoint,
|
||||
CloseTx: commitTx,
|
||||
CommitResolution: commitResolution,
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: htlcResolutions,
|
||||
ChanSnapshot: *chanState.Snapshot(),
|
||||
AnchorResolution: anchorResolution,
|
||||
ChanPoint: chanState.FundingOutpoint,
|
||||
CloseTx: commitTx,
|
||||
ChanSnapshot: *chanState.Snapshot(),
|
||||
ContractResolutions: fn.Some(ContractResolutions{
|
||||
CommitResolution: commitResolution,
|
||||
HtlcResolutions: htlcResolutions,
|
||||
AnchorResolution: anchorResolution,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -958,24 +958,26 @@ func testForceClose(t *testing.T, testCase *forceCloseTestCase) {
|
||||
closeSummary, err := aliceChannel.ForceClose()
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to force close channel")
|
||||
|
||||
resolutionsAlice := closeSummary.ContractResolutions.UnwrapOrFail(t)
|
||||
|
||||
// Alice should detect that she can sweep the outgoing HTLC after a
|
||||
// timeout, but also that she's able to sweep in incoming HTLC Bob sent
|
||||
// her.
|
||||
if len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
if len(resolutionsAlice.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice out htlc resolutions not populated: expected %v "+
|
||||
"htlcs, got %v htlcs",
|
||||
1, len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs))
|
||||
1, len(resolutionsAlice.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
if len(resolutionsAlice.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice in htlc resolutions not populated: expected %v "+
|
||||
"htlcs, got %v htlcs",
|
||||
1, len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs))
|
||||
1, len(resolutionsAlice.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify the anchor resolutions for the anchor commitment format.
|
||||
if testCase.chanType.HasAnchors() {
|
||||
// Check the close summary resolution.
|
||||
anchorRes := closeSummary.AnchorResolution
|
||||
anchorRes := resolutionsAlice.AnchorResolution
|
||||
if anchorRes == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatal("expected anchor resolution")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1009,7 +1011,7 @@ func testForceClose(t *testing.T, testCase *forceCloseTestCase) {
|
||||
|
||||
// The SelfOutputSignDesc should be non-nil since the output to-self is
|
||||
// non-dust.
|
||||
aliceCommitResolution := closeSummary.CommitResolution
|
||||
aliceCommitResolution := resolutionsAlice.CommitResolution
|
||||
if aliceCommitResolution == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice fails to include to-self output in " +
|
||||
"ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
@ -1055,7 +1057,7 @@ func testForceClose(t *testing.T, testCase *forceCloseTestCase) {
|
||||
// Next, we'll ensure that the second level HTLC transaction it itself
|
||||
// spendable, and also that the delivery output (with delay) itself has
|
||||
// a valid sign descriptor.
|
||||
htlcResolution := closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs[0]
|
||||
htlcResolution := resolutionsAlice.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs[0]
|
||||
outHtlcIndex := htlcResolution.SignedTimeoutTx.TxIn[0].PreviousOutPoint.Index
|
||||
senderHtlcPkScript := closeSummary.CloseTx.TxOut[outHtlcIndex].PkScript
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1139,7 +1141,7 @@ func testForceClose(t *testing.T, testCase *forceCloseTestCase) {
|
||||
// We'll now perform similar set of checks to ensure that Alice is able
|
||||
// to sweep the output that Bob sent to her on-chain with knowledge of
|
||||
// the preimage.
|
||||
inHtlcResolution := closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs[0]
|
||||
inHtlcResolution := resolutionsAlice.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs[0]
|
||||
inHtlcIndex := inHtlcResolution.SignedSuccessTx.TxIn[0].PreviousOutPoint.Index
|
||||
receiverHtlcScript := closeSummary.CloseTx.TxOut[inHtlcIndex].PkScript
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1220,7 +1222,8 @@ func testForceClose(t *testing.T, testCase *forceCloseTestCase) {
|
||||
// Check the same for Bob's ForceCloseSummary.
|
||||
closeSummary, err = bobChannel.ForceClose()
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to force close channel")
|
||||
bobCommitResolution := closeSummary.CommitResolution
|
||||
resolutionsBob := closeSummary.ContractResolutions.UnwrapOrFail(t)
|
||||
bobCommitResolution := resolutionsBob.CommitResolution
|
||||
if bobCommitResolution == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob fails to include to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1254,19 +1257,19 @@ func testForceClose(t *testing.T, testCase *forceCloseTestCase) {
|
||||
// As we didn't add the preimage of Alice's HTLC to bob's preimage
|
||||
// cache, he should only detect that he can sweep only his outgoing
|
||||
// HTLC upon force close.
|
||||
if len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
if len(resolutionsBob.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice out htlc resolutions not populated: expected %v "+
|
||||
"htlcs, got %v htlcs",
|
||||
1, len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs))
|
||||
1, len(resolutionsBob.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Bob should recognize that the incoming HTLC is there, but the
|
||||
// preimage should be empty as he doesn't have the knowledge required
|
||||
// to sweep it.
|
||||
if len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
if len(resolutionsBob.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob in htlc resolutions not populated: expected %v "+
|
||||
"htlcs, got %v htlcs",
|
||||
1, len(closeSummary.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs))
|
||||
1, len(resolutionsBob.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1325,9 +1328,11 @@ func TestForceCloseDustOutput(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
closeSummary, err := aliceChannel.ForceClose()
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to force close channel")
|
||||
|
||||
resolutionsAlice := closeSummary.ContractResolutions.UnwrapOrFail(t)
|
||||
|
||||
// Alice's to-self output should still be in the commitment
|
||||
// transaction.
|
||||
commitResolution := closeSummary.CommitResolution
|
||||
commitResolution := resolutionsAlice.CommitResolution
|
||||
if commitResolution == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice fails to include to-self output in " +
|
||||
"ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
@ -1361,10 +1366,11 @@ func TestForceCloseDustOutput(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
closeSummary, err = bobChannel.ForceClose()
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to force close channel")
|
||||
resolutionsBob := closeSummary.ContractResolutions.UnwrapOrFail(t)
|
||||
|
||||
// Bob's to-self output is below Bob's dust value and should be
|
||||
// reflected in the ForceCloseSummary.
|
||||
commitResolution = closeSummary.CommitResolution
|
||||
commitResolution = resolutionsBob.CommitResolution
|
||||
if commitResolution != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob incorrectly includes to-self output in " +
|
||||
"ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ func testVectors(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType, test testCase) {
|
||||
hex.EncodeToString(txBytes.Bytes()),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
resolutions := forceCloseSum.ContractResolutions.UnwrapOrFail(t)
|
||||
|
||||
// Obtain the second level transactions that the local node's channel
|
||||
// state machine has produced. Store them in a map indexed by commit tx
|
||||
// output index. Also complete the second level transaction with the
|
||||
@ -419,7 +421,8 @@ func testVectors(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType, test testCase) {
|
||||
secondLevelTxes[index] = tx
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, r := range forceCloseSum.HtlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs {
|
||||
htlcResolutions := resolutions.HtlcResolutions
|
||||
for _, r := range htlcResolutions.IncomingHTLCs {
|
||||
successTx := r.SignedSuccessTx
|
||||
witnessScript := successTx.TxIn[0].Witness[4]
|
||||
var hash160 [20]byte
|
||||
@ -428,7 +431,7 @@ func testVectors(t *testing.T, chanType channeldb.ChannelType, test testCase) {
|
||||
successTx.TxIn[0].Witness[3] = preimage[:]
|
||||
storeTx(r.HtlcPoint().Index, successTx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
for _, r := range forceCloseSum.HtlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs {
|
||||
for _, r := range htlcResolutions.OutgoingHTLCs {
|
||||
storeTx(r.HtlcPoint().Index, r.SignedTimeoutTx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user